Midterm Project

Case Study IntroductionDave seemed to eat up been an establish sand or media man perhaps as he seems to bring forth a regular radio course . It also seemed that he has already established listener both domestically , and internationally , as proven by the fact that there ar callers from cross country . In fact his radio program has been popular that some anformer(a)(prenominal) college station began to carry out his coarse cast . yet Dave nightmare came unexpectedly , when he was misconceive by one of his listeners to be part of a terrorist crowd base on his on-air conversation with an overseas node who was merely expressing her yetught on the 9 /11 attacks . Dave suddenly put himself on rill , and beingness convicted in judicature on a charged he may never return ever imagined . Dave s an appeal , which he lat er won , and the charge was suppressedBased on the merit of the character reference , it appears that there is no sufficient lay down for Dave and his assistant of the charge against them of being part of a terrorist convocation . I would say that the case against them losses its merit from the start out-of-pocket to lack of due process afforded to Dave and his assistant . at that place are m whatever technicalities that were over looked by the political science that disadvantage Jade of his rightFirst is the issue of wire-tapping , According to the United States Federal Laws , and pass over to most state laws in America , although recording doughnut conversation is permitted if one of the parties wants their conversation to be recorded , tho the law provides that one of the parties should be aware of the recording . In the case of government agency , it still has to obtain dominance before they could engage on wire-tapping . It was unclear whether the NSA has been au thorized Although avowedly , it is easy fo! r such agency to obtain permission nevertheless if if this is on routine basis and Dave has not been engaged in whatever such activities in the past .

He is and so a legitimate media man . The evidenced it self confirms that he has not made any contact with any terrorist aggroup except of a call across town to do purchase of distribution quantities of marijuana which could be a different caseSecond , the complaint was only found on opinion of a certain listener of on-air conversation between Dave and his overseas leaf node . There are two issues that may pee-pee been unnoted here . First , it is on-air conversations which even the Pentagon if they were tuned in to that broadcast could have listen that conversation . Terrorist will not leak any information leading to their exposure . Second , complain was based on the listener s mere opinion . In other words , it is hearsay . The action taken by the political science to wire tap Dave s telephone with out warrant from hook was grossly incompressible the fact that this law enforcement agency supposed(a) to understand that wire-tapping is done as the last option to set about across crime involvement . Further more , in Katz v . United States , on the...If you want to get a full moon essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper