Law of Property 1 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

Law of Property 1 - screen ExampleJane carried on paying the instalments on the bestow. In 2009 Harry became ill and died. Jane has continued to pay the instalments to the relay transmitter direct. Under Harrys will, all his holding passes to his widow, Helena. There is ?1,000 still owing on the loan. Helena, as executrix of and sole beneficiary under the will, has applied for a possession order against Jane. offer Jane. Students are apprised not to consider the Land Registration Acts but to answer the question within the syllabus. 2. capital of Maine had a friend Julius, who was in financial difficulties. Augusta lent Julius ?5,000 to get himself sorted out. At Augustas insistence, Julius institutionalise the money into a separate bank account and told the bank, to whom he owed money, that the money was a special loan from Augusta. Julius used ?2,000 of the money to pay various debts before he was declared bankrupt. ?3,000 remains in the account. Augusta died leaving a will containing the following provisions To my son Cassius I leave ?20,000 to enjoy as he likes during his lifetime, provided that, at his death, he leaves any of the money that remains to his sister Demeter, The rest of my estate I leave to Gaius and Lucius on trust, so that they may make grants out of the income from this fund to any of the descendants of my historied ancestor Tarquin and their families. Tarquin lived two hundred years ago and is reputed to hold back had many children both legitimate and illegitimate. Advise Cassius as to his rights and duties over the ?20,000. Advise Augustas executors as to whether they will be able to acquire the balance of ?3,000 in Julius bank account. Advise Gaius and Lucius as to their powers and obligations with the regard to the residue of Augustas estate. hesitancy 1 In the above, it is necessary to consider what rights Jane might grant over the holding. This will involve analysing how proprietorship rights over property can be establis hed. Under the Law of Property Act 1925 the person registered on the deed for the property will be the legal owner of the estate1. This effectively means that Harry would have been the legal owner despite his promise to give the property to Jane if she paid off the loan. The effect of the go out would mean that the house would transfer in ownership to Helena, which would entitle her to dispose of it in any manner she sees fit2. However, this would create unfairness to Jane who has been paying the money owed to Harry and latterly to his friend on the understanding that she would have a right to the property. As there is no written agreement between Jane and Harry, and Harry has not expressly left the property to Jane in his Will, the notwithstanding rights she might have in relation to the property would be an equitable interest3. As a result of this, Jane might have to rely on the doctrine of implied trusts to be able to claim a share of the property. Implied trusts can exist thr ough statute or as a resulting or constructive trust. The latter 2 trusts exist in equity only and are applied by the courts to rectify any unfairness caused by the denial of legal property rights through the property only being registered in one parties name. A resulting trust occurs where there is secern that the claimant has made payments towards the purchase price of the property but was not included on the register as an owner. Those relying on this principle have to prove that they expended the money in the belief that they would acquire an interest in the property,