Was William Shakespeare the author of his plays and sonnets Essay

Was William Shakespeare the author of his plays and sonnets - Essay ExampleIt is herculean to determine the identity of the young man, which is apparent from references made in individual sonnets (Baxter, 1917).As the most authoritative the documents of the time did not mentioned such name such as a Shakespeare. During the Renaissance period, poets were not allowed to write poetry, so it is possible to assume that one of the poets took a pseudonym William Shake-speare. Critics suppose that his true name was Edward de Vere. Edward de Vere was emend educated than Shakespeare which allowed de Vere to describe events and manners of those times in details. On the other hand, the main problem is that at that place is no evidence that Shakespeare was an actor. For example, at that place is no record of any part he may stand played, and only two posthumous traditions to bit parts (A Beginners Guide, n.d.).The main fact against Shakespeares authorship is that no manuscripts of Shakespea res plays survive. Indeed, there are very few manuscripts available to scholars of plays of the Elizabethan and Jacobean period. Also, many editions, used as a basis for making modern textbooks into performances in modern star signs, have been put together by editors from earliest (sixteenth and seventeenth century) printed versions of the plays, published in small editions after the play itself had ceased to be regularly performed. In these editions the text is not always divided into acts and scenes, and when it is, the work, together with the punctuation, spelling and stage directions, is that of the first compositors who set the type from a manuscript probably supplied by the theatre. The first eight plays of Shakespeare to be published did not bear his name, just now this was standard trust at the time, since few editions of plays bore the name of the author. It is important to note that this was normal habituate at the time, for once a dramatist had sold his play to a th eatrical enterprise, he gave up his ownership and copyright of the work. So, it is possible to say that the plays were not written by Shakespeare. In a state to their work, the editors claim that their texts are more reliable than those to be found in the quartos, many of which were illegally or hastily prepared. (Lancashire, 1998). Other facts against Shakespeares authorship state that some of the earliest printed versions of the same Shakespeare play differ, quite significantly, in the text that they print. The question then arises as to which of the different versions is the correct one. The main problem is that there is no definitive, slackly excepted edition. Also most all texts have been reconstructed by generations of scholars from several of the earliest printed editions of the play. In the practice of Shakespeares theatre, the authority of the written text was secondary to that of the spoken and the visual, and what was considered to be theatrically effective - what made battalion actually want to pay money to visit the theatre - was the paramount consideration of the actors and dramatist. The Elizabethan theatre did not possess a huge repertory of classic plays from the past. Almost all the plays shown on the macrocosm stages were being shown for the first time, this meant that there was tremendous pressure on dramatists such as Shakespeare to go on producing new plays, because audiences wanted, above all, to see new work. The players, or certainly